Which one is better RIDES, Leaf Photosynthesis MultispeQ v2 Protocls

Measurements, Protocols & Macros

File 585e5f5b 7180 4bd4 bb24 9a727146f342
File 726bd30e 21fe 4945 bcfd 7a9f3695b737

Hello, I have gone through the following manuscripts 1. Kromdijk, J., GÅ‚owacka, K., Leonelli, L., Gabilly, S. T., Iwai, M., Niyogi, K. K., and Long, S. P. (2016). Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354, 857-861.enter link description here 2. Hubbart, S., Smillie, I. R. A., Heatley, M., Swarup, R., Foo, C. C., Zhao, L., and Murchie, E. H. (2018). Enhanced thylakoid photoprotection can increase yield and canopy radiation use efficiency in rice. Communications Biology 1, 22.

I understand that NPQ flexibility allows the plant to buffer the light-induced changes in ETR and thus regulate photosynthetic metabolism. NPQ or PhiNPQ or NPQ(T) or qE can be used as potential selection criteria for improving crop productivity. My Question is Using MultispeQ, which protocol is best for phenotyping wheat lines.

  • created

    Mar 2019

  • last reply

    Mar 2019

  • replies


  • users


  • Thumb habib profile picture
  • Thumb sebastian kuhlgert square
Thumb sebastian kuhlgert square


Mar 2019

Hi Habib,

I would recommend using the Leaf Photosynthesis RIDES protocol instead of the Leaf Photosynthesis, since the ECS data, that is collected using RIDES, has been improved.